Recruiters are often faced with the fact that top managers
were forced to leave in search of a new job, consider the job successful
companies, often happens completely not their fault, and in most cases depends
on extraneous factors.
No change is impossible and external changes within the
company, for example, a breakthrough in technology, access to the market
leader, winning a place of honor in the list of successful and profitable
businesses. In some enterprises, constant innovations are part of the corporate
culture, and, as a rule, in such organizations increased turnover is between
reducing the number of implemented changes. On the other hand, the manager
accustomed to predictability, also fears change. Usually this fear arises from
a misunderstanding of the situation or from inability to wait or that most
often occurs from a lack of sufficient information about where the company is
moving.
The change becomes leader or professional concern, if he
does not see the purpose of the activity ceases to be aware of changes, do not
respond properly to what is happening, does not want to change and do not
understand that I must do it, trying to pull away from the changes, telling
myself, they affect him in the least. Changes often destabilize the situation
in the team and make the managers look for new methods of governance, which
raises the need for a constructive approach to the management of change
themselves. If your company is in the process of reorganization, general
director of the company can rely on a team of top managers who have the
ability, communication, reputation and formal powers required to implement
changes, they must be wholly trust both from the head, and on the part of
subordinates. In this case, the company will master the necessary changes
without undue loss. If between the managers there is no common understanding of
the meaning of change, they are either a group of "active resistance"
led by the informal leader or passive crowd going to the designated senior
management goals. The more motivated executives, the more they are able to
create a cohesive team in his division.
For a manager at any level, even if he is the initiator of
change, stress during reorganization is inevitable. Resistance to change - it's
a natural reaction that occurs every time they entail the destruction of the
already existing stereotypes of behavior. "The fever of fear", which
appeared at the head of one, transferred to others and through them - the rest
of the team. Internal resistance to change is inevitable, if the manager: does
not possess enough information about what is happening in the company, are not
able to draw conclusions from the current situation, therefore can not predict
future events; is unable or does not wish to develop a new style of behavior in
the workplace, is afraid to lose face in the eyes of the leadership and
colleagues because of his unsuccessful action, feels that as a result of
changes may be superfluous, and fear of dismissal, fears that reduced its
impact on the superiors, and as a result, reduced the remuneration for his
work. Good top-manager in the restructuring the situation is going through and
for his subordinates. Changes usually are restructuring the company's structure
and staffing, changes in the monetary payments system, redistribution of
functional duties of employees. All this puts the chief to have to explain the
subordinate position to reassure them and motivate so that they are not looking
for a new job. It happens that the break-knit groups in which the loyalty of
top managers were absolutely sure. For example, the family lost its unity in a
short period of time because the management has decided to redistribute
responsibilities within the units. Often, management expects that can keep
employees from dismissal appeals to their conscience and assurances, but make
it very difficult. And soon most of the former employees of the enterprise "hang"
on the job sites looking for the right job. While negative changes have not
touched a particular employee, he can work on the principle of "necessary
- so necessary," but as soon as they affect individual interests, will
crumble all built incentives.
To maintain team unity in the first place need to preserve
the team of senior managers and their effective motivation. To do this, first
of all, the need to inform managers about the changes was to carry out
activities of an expository nature, in which managers will find answers to all
their questions, and they will develop a clear picture of how and by what means
will be carried out changes. It is important that the company's director in
explaining the inevitability of the reorganization, acknowledged the merits of
the old schemes of work and its supporters to the company, as well as to
integrate them into the process of developing constructive proposals concerning
the new system the Director General should be discussed with all the top
managers of the need for change and to involve each of them in a constructive
dialogue about what is happening,
Understanding the top managers of the fact that the
implementation of the Global plans depends on the performance of each
individual manager and the team as a whole - the key to successful change at
the CEO at the outset should adjust their subordinates. The decision-making
should involve all those who will carry out the conversion, including the
ordinary performers. Ideal - when manager, thoroughly understand the goals and
methods of change, he is in discussions with its employees, both individually
and with groups. The task of Director of Human Resources - to make sure that
the explanation of the control accessible and understandable to all. His role
at this stage is to prepare the manager to talk with subordinates. Every top
manager ever faced with the introduction of changes in the enterprise and,
therefore, He is the bearer of a unique experience in terms of change. His
point of view can also be useful to influence the course of events, if it is
supported by knowledge of the industry and production processes, as well as the
characteristics of a particular group. Expert with similar experience
automatically becomes a perfect conductor changes. If its credibility in the
company is strong enough, it can be said that the problem of influence on
public opinion is half solved. In large holdings, to this end, sometimes for
the dispatch management team to create groups of the number of line managers
and affiliates working with them, and through them - with all the personnel of
the enterprise. These are necessary measures that support innovation on the
part of the head office through their leaders. His point of view can also be
useful to influence the course of events, if it is supported by knowledge of
the industry and production processes, as well as the characteristics of a
particular group. Expert with similar experience automatically becomes a
perfect conductor changes. If its credibility in the company is strong enough, it
can be said that the problem of influence on public opinion is half solved. In
large holdings, to this end, sometimes for the dispatch management team to
create groups of the number of line managers and affiliates working with them,
and through them - with all the personnel of the enterprise. These are
necessary measures that support innovation on the part of the head office
through their leaders. His point of view can also be useful to influence the
course of events, if it is supported by knowledge of the industry and
production processes, as well as the characteristics of a particular group.
Expert with similar experience automatically becomes a perfect conductor
changes. If its credibility in the company is strong enough, it can be said
that the problem of influence on public opinion is half solved. In large
holdings, to this end, sometimes for the dispatch management team to create
groups of the number of line managers and affiliates working with them, and
through them - with all the personnel of the enterprise. These are necessary
measures that support innovation on the part of the head office through their
leaders. if it is supported by knowledge of the industry and production
processes, as well as the characteristics of a particular group. Expert with
similar experience automatically becomes a perfect conductor changes. If its
credibility in the company is strong enough, it can be said that the problem of
influence on public opinion is half solved. In large holdings, to this end,
sometimes for the dispatch management team to create groups of the number of
line managers and affiliates working with them, and through them - with all the
personnel of the enterprise. These are necessary measures that support
innovation on the part of the head office through their leaders. if it is
supported by knowledge of the industry and production processes, as well as the
characteristics of a particular group. Expert with similar experience
automatically becomes a perfect conductor changes. If its credibility in the company
is strong enough, it can be said that the problem of influence on public
opinion is half solved. In large holdings, to this end, sometimes for the
dispatch management team to create groups of the number of line managers and
affiliates working with them, and through them - with all the personnel of the
enterprise. These are necessary measures that support innovation on the part of
the head office through their leaders. If its credibility in the company is
strong enough, it can be said that the problem of influence on public opinion
is half solved. In large holdings, to this end, sometimes for the dispatch
management team to create groups of the number of line managers and affiliates
working with them, and through them - with all the personnel of the enterprise.
These are necessary measures that support innovation on the part of the head
office through their leaders. If its credibility in the company is strong
enough, it can be said that the problem of influence on public opinion is half
solved. In large holdings, to this end, sometimes for the dispatch management
team to create groups of the number of line managers and affiliates working
with them, and through them - with all the personnel of the enterprise. These
are necessary measures that support innovation on the part of the head office
through their leaders.
Such groups
are executing changes in subsidiaries. Administrative impact on staff and the
recognition of merit - the main aspect of the motivation of top managers in
conducting global change. Proper direction of the head of the organization to
influence senior managers is its trump card when creating a strong top team.
Incorrect redistribution of power can lead to a drop in the authority of the
head of the management team, respectively, to the loss of credibility on the
part of his subordinates. Ordinary workers are sensitive to changes in the
situation of power at the top, and negative conclusions they make, not very
soon be turned into a positive, which leads to demotivation and resistance to
the decisions taken by its Director. Understanding the true meaning of the
manager of the forthcoming changes,
Payment is
one of the motivating factors. If the goals are achieved, the employees
receive their promised reward. Most often, the staff is ready to focus on
achieving the goals, if these goals are realistic. Too complex goals, the
probability of the achievement of which is extremely small, not motivated
staff. Material motivation of employees for the achievement of the objectives
may be supplemented by the non-material, but it should be made clear during his
employment. One of the most important steps in a time of change - improving
communicative competence of senior managers. Even when they are professional
enough and interested in achieving this goal, the elementary inability to agree
may prevent them succeed. Differences leaders, due to different approaches to
the problem, work experience, managerial competence are solvable. The lack of a
uniform terminology for all managers may entail such malfunctions, because of
which the leadership will have to come back to the starting point and begin the
process of change with a common means of expression search. The
Director-General or the head of the personnel department should at the
beginning of the discussion with the heads of changes to clarify the meaning of
the terms used. For example, when discussing the reduction of specific cost
items all managers need to understand the same article and know exactly what is
meant by their decrease in this case. In the course of the company's management
structure changes everything must be absolutely clear which business processes
will affect the reorganization,
The basis of the objectives of harmonization of the concept
make key management decisions taken with respect to the motivation system in
the company. First, you must determine the number of hierarchy levels, which
will be formulated goals. The possible levels can be called the level of the
company as a whole, functional areas, departments and individual employees. At
the collective level to formulate objectives have the advantage of simply
measured their achievements and the degree of influence on the target company
as a whole. The downside - it is unclear responsibility and indirect
opportunities to influence individual employees to achieve group goals. In
practice, therefore, tend to combine individual goals with the collective. For
the individual company level formulates its objectives. For the purpose of
collective levels defines the company's management. As part of the Balanced
Scorecard goals of departments and target values describing their performance
is directly derived from the card company's goals. For individual-level goals
realized the process of agreeing objectives with a particular employee.
According
to Ukrainian experts, who have experience of training work groups to identify
leaders among leaders, mainly in client company formed a request for training
leaders of ambitious managers. Unfortunately, many of these managers are
completely unfamiliar with the peculiarities of communication within the
company, does not possess the necessary skills of personnel management. Another
factor - the crisis situation in which a matter of urgency to start searching
for leaders who can rally the team. It may be that your team is not a leader,
but as far as the team is effective, as is able to grow and move forward,
depends on whether there is in him the authoritative leaders with personnel
management experience and enterprise. A good leader - a person with charisma.
Often, it oriented people, they realize that he - the leader. Such leaders are
not making efforts to develop the leadership qualities, rather, they are
entitled to them from birth. One can not disagree with the fact that there are
people that only age and experience reveal their managerial talent, so add up
the circumstances, that these qualities manifest themselves in a particular
situation, such as when it is necessary to lead the team. Crisis, stress and
simple situations become for many managers of the reference point from which to
start their path and development as a truly successful and effective top
managers. that only age and experience reveal their managerial talent, so the
circumstances are that these qualities manifest themselves in a particular
situation, such as when it is necessary to lead the team. Crisis, stress and
simple situations become for many managers of the reference point from which to
start their path and development as a truly successful and effective top
managers. that only age and experience reveal their managerial talent, so the
circumstances are that these qualities manifest themselves in a particular
situation, such as when it is necessary to lead the team. Crisis, stress and
simple situations become for many managers of the reference point from which to
start their path and development as a truly successful and effective top
managers.
Outsourcing to be!
For some companies, outsourcing is becoming a panacea, while
others fired on it. A few years ago the world media trumpeted the outsourcing
approaching death. Pessimism gripped top managers after a series of failures of
American giant companies. But if earlier, analysts predicted the sunset era of
outsourcing, linking it to the growing discontent of workers, who as a result of
this policy of US and European companies could remain out of work. Others
referred to the future political instability and the weakening of security on a
global scale, which should lead to outsourcing. Pessimistic forecasts were not
justified. On the contrary, the outsourcing market, delivering financial
services to corporations, technology, human resources management services, real
estate, logistics and other business processes, during all these years shows a
steady growth. Today, many top managers, planning to restructure the company,
outsourcing all use frequently.
In the market of such services is still there are many large
and small companies, but we can talk about a certain specialization: major
suppliers of outsourcing services are presented by companies "full
cycle", while smaller chosen niche strategy and develop solutions that
address the needs of one or two customers. The future, no doubt, for the first
type of companies. They provide services to its customers around the world and
provide uniform standards of work. Involvement in the business processes of
customers of these companies are significantly higher than those of their
smaller "brothers". Another obvious trend - simplifying the purchase
process outsourcing solutions. Now companies have to go through a long stage of
registration of long-term contracts with suppliers of outsourcing services.
However, in the future, customers will be able to purchase decisions quickly -
without any paperwork and approvals obligations, rights, responsibilities. It
will be at the store: come, put the desired product in a cart, pay - and
benefit. But in order to make these dreams come true, need to work together
senior managers of client companies and developers outsourcing solutions: only
together they will be able to develop uniform standards, to determine the
requirements and possibilities of each other.
Existing now obstacles to the development of outsourcing
will continue to influence the market. For example, providers of outsourcing
services should be, as now, to convince future customers in their ability to
fulfill the order. They will be able to demonstrate their commitment to meet
customer needs, their knowledge and understanding of customer business
processes. Tomorrow's customers, as of today, they want to be sure that the
information they provide will be well protected. The low level of training and
staff shortages - that's one of the main problems that may face the outsourcing
market in the coming years. Headhunting talented managers who can manage
complex processes. To prevent a decline in the quality of their services,
companies produce various own HR strategy. One of the most popular - frames
growing strategy "from scratch". Apparently, this move proved to be
successful and has been used successfully in many companies.
Outsourcing for the enterprise - exactly the wives of
crisis, as well as restructuring. Single solution to the crisis arising from
the introduction of changes in a company does not exist. No recipe will help
avoid most of the problems encountered along the way. But if they are engaged
in overcoming the cohesive management team, new schemes of work dictated by the
changes will be implemented correctly and crashes resolved quickly and
professionally. attractive employer image, in turn, means a competitive
advantage, since the labor market in recent years has inflamed real struggle for
the best employees - the so-called "high potential." Many companies
no longer perceive their employees as the beneficiaries and executors of
orders. They are increasingly in a new approach to the role of employees,
Commending the contribution of each to the entrepreneurial culture in the
development of innovative ideas and the overall success of the enterprise. Thus
it is becoming increasingly important selection of appropriate and truly the
best staff.
No comments:
Post a Comment